Bring evidence, not certainty
Explain what you observed, link the primary source when possible, and say what would change your view. Do not present a forecast, price target, or personal opinion as guaranteed fact.
AlgoThesis community
Useful market discussion has receipts.
These standards keep reader contributions focused on learning from a story over time. They apply to comments, replies, public profiles, and shared research.
What we expect
Challenge the claim, not the person
Disagreement is useful. Harassment, threats, slurs, dogpiling, and attempts to expose someone’s private information are not.
No manipulation or undisclosed promotion
Do not coordinate hype, impersonate a person or company, post repeated promotional links, or hide a material financial interest in what you are promoting.
Keep the discussion connected
Contributions should relate to the story, company, catalyst, or evidence under discussion. Repeated off-topic posting and automated spam may be removed.
How moderation works
- Readers can report a contribution and optionally explain why.
- Three distinct reports temporarily hide it while keeping the record available for review.
- A moderator reviews the content and context, then records a remove, restore, or dismissal decision with a note and timestamp.
- Repeated spam or abuse can lead to interaction limits or account action. Blocking immediately removes follows in both directions and hides contributions between those accounts.
A report is not a vote on whether an argument is correct. Good-faith disagreement and uncomfortable counter-evidence should be restored.
Appeal or ask a question
If your contribution was removed, send the comment URL, your handle, and why you believe the decision should be reconsidered. Do not include holdings, account credentials, or other sensitive information.
Contact moderation →Community contributions are reader views, not investment advice. AlgoThesis does not verify every claim or external link. Review primary sources and make your own decisions.