Thune "Open To Exploring" Diesel Export Ban As Skyrocketing Prices Raise Fears Of 2008-Style Shock
Senate Majority Leader John Thune said he is “open to exploring” a diesel export ban as AAA’s national average price for diesel topped $6.27 a gallon. The comments put fuel availability and trade policy at the center of a fast-moving energy squeeze, but do not establish that a ban will be pursued.
Thune made the comments to reporters on September 15, according to ZeroHedge, as AAA’s national average diesel price reached more than $6.27 a gallon. The report links the policy discussion to warnings from Bloomberg Intelligence senior commodity strategist Mike McGlone about surging fuel prices and the risk of a shock resembling 2008.
The latest remarks follow that warning rather than a formal policy announcement. Thune’s wording—“open to exploring” or “open to considering” an export ban—signals receptiveness to examining the measure, but does not provide a proposal, timetable or indication of support from other lawmakers or the administration.
A diesel export restriction would connect domestic fuel prices with refiners, exporters and overseas buyers by potentially redirecting barrels toward the US market. The report does not identify affected companies, estimate the volume of exports involved or quantify the likely price impact.
The policy path remains uncertain. ZeroHedge did not report whether Thune has begun consultations, whether legislation is being drafted or whether the administration supports an export ban. It also did not establish that current prices constitute a repeat of the 2008 shock; that comparison came through McGlone’s warning.
The next decisive evidence would be a formal proposal, statements from the administration and other congressional leaders, or a change in AAA’s diesel average. Until then, the story establishes political openness to exploring a restriction, not an enacted trade measure.
The remarks raise policy risk for diesel exporters while leaving the market impact unresolved without a formal ban or implementation details.
The immediate implication is policy uncertainty rather than a confirmed supply intervention: an export ban could redirect diesel toward US consumers, but the reporting supplies no proposal, timetable or affected-company list. The $6.27-a-gallon price and 2008 comparison make the issue politically salient, while the absence of company-specific exposure prevents a single-name read.
The policy risk fades if Thune’s comments do not lead to a formal proposal or if diesel prices retreat from current highs.
CoverageSource: ZeroHedge · Published here TUE, SEP 15 · 2:20 PM ET · 2 reports · 2 publishers in this record · latest listed: MarketWatch · TUE, SEP 15 · 4:19 PM ETHow this is decided →
STOCK PHOTO · WOLFGANG WEISEREarlier context and later coverage are dated relative to this report. Automatically linked reports may cover a broader event.
No later reports linked yet.
Follow this story to find new evidence in your Following desk.
A restriction could redirect export volumes into the domestic market and ease pressure on US diesel availability.
Limited directional case: Thune’s comment is only an expression of openness, with no formal ban, timing or quantified market effect reported.
Kept as written · your side, if you take one, is graded privately against licensed closes after 10 trading days · nothing here is advice · How the Wire is made →