Bitcoin supply in loss reaches record high 10.83 million BTC
1 min readAnalysis by AlgoThesis Editorial Desk
Market Memory
What changed after the headline
The original read stays visible beside later evidence. Connections are editorial records, not ticker-only guesses.
Price since this story
Equal-weight basket · first close after publication
Price context does not establish that the story caused the move.
The story
On-chain data now shows 10.83 million BTC held at a loss — a record high by this metric — while simultaneously long-term holders (LTH) control a record 14.8 million BTC, their largest-ever share of circulating supply. The two records arriving together is the key dynamic: it tells you that a massive cohort is deeply underwater, but that the patient, 'diamond-hand' segment of the market has not flinched.
Historically, peaks in supply-in-loss have clustered near cycle bottoms. The 2018 bear market low and the June 2022 capitulation both saw similar spikes in this metric before price recovered. The concurrent record in LTH supply suggests distribution from this group has not begun — they are absorbing, not selling.
The bear tension is real, however. A record number of coins in loss means a vast overhang of potential sell pressure the moment price rallies toward those cost bases. If macro conditions worsen or liquidity tightens, forced selling from underwater short-term holders could cascade before LTH conviction provides a floor.
The critical thing to watch is whether LTH supply begins to decline — that would signal the patient cohort is finally distributing into any rally, which has historically marked intermediate tops. As long as LTH supply continues to climb or hold flat, the on-chain setup leans constructive for a medium-term recovery thesis, but the overhead supply of 10.83 million coins-in-loss is a genuine ceiling.
The two-sided take
The house read
Two-sidedWrong ifA macro-driven liquidity shock or ETF outflow acceleration could force short-term holder capitulation before LTH conviction provides a bid, breaking the historical analogy and extending losses further.
Published read · research, not advice
