Kansas City Fed's Schmid says inflation 'stubborn' and 'sticky,' policy rate not restrictive
Kansas City Fed President Jeffrey Schmid said inflation remains “stubborn” and “sticky,” arguing that the policy rate is not restrictive and stopping just short of explicitly calling for a hike. The comments keep the risk tilted toward a higher-for-longer Federal Reserve stance, with the next inflation and labor data carrying more weight for rate expectations.
File photo · The Federal Reserve’s Eccles Building, Washington · Mar 2011 · Federal Reserve · Public domain · Source & licenseKansas City Federal Reserve President Jeffrey Schmid said inflation remains "stubborn" and "sticky" and that the current policy rate is not restrictive. He stopped short of directly calling for an interest-rate increase, leaving the remarks as a warning about policy restraint rather than a formal demand for another hike.
The comments add to the debate over how much further the Federal Reserve may need to go after its earlier policy decisions. Schmid's assessment suggests that the present rate setting is not yet doing enough to bring inflation back under control, while his reluctance to explicitly advocate a hike indicates that the policy path remains data-dependent.
The immediate mechanism runs through Treasury yields, mortgage and borrowing costs, and expectations for interest-sensitive sectors. A less restrictive Fed stance would generally support tighter financial conditions for rate-sensitive companies and households, while financial markets would reassess the timing and extent of future policy easing.
Schmid's language leaves important uncertainty. He did not call outright for a rate hike. The strength and persistence of inflation, as well as incoming employment data, will determine whether his assessment becomes a broader policy position or remains a dissenting emphasis.
The next signals are the upcoming inflation and labor-market releases and subsequent Federal Reserve communications. Those data will show whether price pressures are continuing to defy policymakers' expectations and whether employment conditions leave room for the Fed to keep rates high. The open question is whether "not restrictive" becomes a basis for renewed tightening or simply supports a slower pace of eventual easing.
With no single-company ticker in play, Schmid’s comments shift the macro risk toward higher-for-longer rates while the absence of an explicit hike call keeps the signal from becoming a one-way trade.
The implication is tighter financial conditions and a reduced presumption of near-term policy easing if inflation stays “stubborn” and “sticky.” But Schmid stopped short of calling for a hike, and without a single-name equity or a dated next policy event supplied here, the evidence supports a macro risk shift rather than a directional trade.
A softer inflation or labor-market reading, or a broader Fed preference to hold rather than hike, would undercut the higher-for-longer interpretation.
CoverageSource: CNBC · Published here THU, AUG 27 · 10:11 AM ET · the only report in this recordHow this is decided →
Earlier context and later coverage are dated relative to this report. Automatically linked reports may cover a broader event.
No later reports linked yet.
Follow this story to find new evidence in your Following desk.
Persistent inflation alongside Schmid’s view that the policy rate is not restrictive would support higher-for-longer rates and tighter financial conditions.
Schmid did not explicitly call for a hike, so the remarks may amount only to caution against rapid easing rather than evidence of an imminent tightening cycle.
Kept as written · your side, if you take one, is graded privately against licensed closes after 10 trading days · nothing here is advice · How the Wire is made →