Micron’s stock is on the rise. Even Apple isn’t safe from ballooning memory-chip costs.
An analyst warns that memory chip demand will continue to outpace supply in the near term, pushing costs higher even for mega-cap customers like Apple. Micron's revenue surged 48.9% YoY to $37.4B with gross margins near 40%, suggesting pricing power that could pressure AAPL's hardware margins.
What happened
An analyst warns that memory chip demand will continue to outpace supply in the near term, pushing costs higher even for mega-cap customers like Apple.
The read · Jun 18
MU's sustained pricing power and AAPL's exposure as a large memory buyer frame the question of whether the memory upcycle lifts MU further while compressing Apple's hardware margins.
Wrong if
A faster-than-expected ramp in HBM or commodity DRAM supply — or a macro demand air pocket in AI capex — would flip memory pricing and collapse the MU leg while potentially relieving AAPL's cost pressure simultaneously, killing both sides of the pair.
CoverageSource: MarketWatch · Published here THU, JUN 18 · 8:16 AM ET · the only report in this recordHow this is decided →
The chart · MUTradingView · third-party feed, not the Wire’s licensed closes
🔒 Click to interact · scroll moves the page
The story1 min read
A MarketWatch-cited analyst argues that DRAM and NAND supply additions will lag robust AI and consumer demand, sustaining elevated memory pricing through the near term. Micron's FY2025 results back that thesis: revenue of $37.4B (+48.9% YoY), 39.8% gross margins, and $7.59 diluted EPS reflect a pricing cycle that is still running hot rather than rolling over.
The second-order setup is a pair tension between MU (pricing power beneficiary) and AAPL (cost-inflation risk) — Apple's 46.9% gross margin is best-in-class but memory is a meaningful BOM input for iPhone and Mac. Watch AAPL's next earnings for any gross margin guidance haircut, and watch MU for signs that capacity additions are accelerating faster than the analyst expects, which would be the main catalyst to flip this narrative.
The read, in fullWhy it matters
MU's 48.9% YoY revenue growth and ~40% gross margins indicate pricing power still intact, while AAPL's hardware segment carries meaningful memory content — rising DRAM/NAND costs squeeze Apple BOM without a near-term offset. The pair trade (long MU / short AAPL) captures the supply/demand asymmetry the analyst cites without taking broad market risk. No insider selling signal or analyst consensus data is available to tighten the case further, so confidence is held moderate.
The arc● Open · no developments yet
· Published
The read above, as written. kept as written · closes shown from JUN 18 on
Next · what would move this
4-8 weeks, into next MU earnings print. Follow to be told when one lands.
Since this story · named here, equal weight · 1D EOD-1.5%
JUN 18 · first close after publicationSEP 4
Price context does not establish that the story caused the move.
▲ The case it holds
MU's 48.9% revenue growth and nearly 40% gross margins, sustained into a period of rising AI-driven HBM demand, support further earnings estimate revisions higher that the current price may not fully reflect.
▼ The case it breaks
Memory cycles are notoriously mean-reverting, and the analyst warning itself signals the market is already aware of the supply/demand imbalance — much of MU's upcycle may already be priced in after a strong FY2025 print.
Kept as written · your side, if you take one, is graded privately against licensed closes after 10 trading days · nothing here is advice · How the Wire is made →